传统的通知发布系统,具有一定的局限性,不能够确保目标对象都能阅读到通知的内容。本文结合现今的趋势和用户的喜好,开发出一个基于Android平台的通知发布系统,这对于提高通知的时效性和传播性有很大的作用,确保通知内容能被每个通知对象所阅读。使用Android的UI设计、操作和代码的编写等相应的步骤,完成通知内容的输入、修改、查询、删除、统计等操作,通过Web作为服务端与Android客户端进行连接,达到通知对象阅读新闻的目的。

The traditional announcement system, with certain limitations, cannot ensure that every target ob-ject reads the notification. Considering today''s trends and user preferences, the paper therefore develops a release notification system based on Android platform, which contributes to improving the timeliness and dissemination of the notification, and ensuring that the content can be read by each object. The system by adopting the Android UI design, operation and coding, and implementing input, modify, query, delete, and statistical analysis, among other operations, with web as the server and Android the client, enables the notification being read by objects.

作为我国保险法上的一项重要义务，危险通知是指在保险责任期间，一旦保险标的发生保险事故的危险程度显著增加，投保人或被保险人应该及时的通知保险人。这一义务是对保险人的不利益进行救济，旨在恢复保险合同的对价平衡，可以有效的控制风险，促进保险事业的健康可持续发展。作为一种法律事实，危险增加有其特定的要素，并不是一发生危险增加的事项就对投保人或被保险人构成危险通知义务，我国《保险法》中有关于危险增加通知义务的规定，但是规定过于原则化，在实践中操作性不强，司法审判实践中难以对当事人之间的纠纷定纷止争。本文主要对危险通知义务的基本理论进行概述，在此基础上对危险增加的构成要件进行分析，最后对危险增加通知义务的履行及怠于履行的法律后果进行阐述。

As an important obligation of the insurance law of our country, risk notice refers to the period of insurance, once the insurance mark insurance accident risk increased significantly, the applicant or the insured shall notify the insurer. This obligation is to the insurer does not interest, to restore the insurance contract, the balance of the price, can effectively control risk, To promote the healthy and sustainable development of the insurance industry. As a legal fact, increased risk has its specific elements, and not an increased risk of events is dangerous duty of notification to the applicant or the insured,"insurance law"of our country has increased the risk of the obligation of notification about rules, but the provisions are too principle, operability is not strong in judicial practice, In judicial practice, it is difficult to settle disputes among the parties. This paper summarizes the basic theory of risk the obligation of notification, on this basis, to increase the risk o

网络侵权是发生在互联网这一特殊平台上的新型侵权形态,其具有侵权主体匿名性、传播快捷性、影响广泛性和不可逆转性、造成后果严重性等特征。网络侵权通常都涉及直接侵权人和网络服务提供者,而网络服务提供者与侵权行为实施者在主观心态、损害预防能力和效果上都存在重大差异,网络侵权责任承担区别于一般侵权。通知规则作为网络侵权中的一般规则决定了网络服务提供者承担责任的界限,明确通知规则的产生、发展与责任特征以及与此相关的反通知规则及其效力,对于理解网络服务提供者违反通知规则的责任具有重要意义。

The cyber torts are a new type of tortious behaviors conducted in network , with such features as the anonymous tortfeasors , rapid transmission , extensive and irreversible influences and severe conse-quences .The direct tortfeasor and network providers are often involved in cyber torts , but they have major differences in subjective state , ability and effects of undertaking precautions from damage .Besides, cyber torts differ from general torts in assuming tortious liabilities .As the general doctrine for cyber torts , the doctrine of notice is to determine the liability limit assumed by network providers .Therefore, it is of vital importance to specify the introduction , development process and liability features of notice doctrine as well as the counter -notice rule and its effects so as to better understand the network provider ’ s liability in violation of the doctrine of notice.

目前很多高校同时使用多个管理信息系统，造成系统独立和信息分散的现状。本系统目的在于整合多个系统的信息数据，将数据发送给相关人员进行查询。对于紧急信息，系统还可以提供邮件和短信等主动通知方式通知相关人员，做到准确快速投放信息。由于本系统没有针对高校环境做特定假设，所以本系统可以经过简单的修改应用于其他环境，具备良好的通用性。

Many colleges and universities always use multiple MIS simultaneously, leading to system independent and scattered information. This system aims to integrate the information and data of multiple systems, to provide relevant data to the staff query. For emergency information, the system can also provide e-mail and SMS notification method to send information quickly and accurately. The system does not make specific assumptions for the university environment, so the system can be used in other environments through simple modifications. The system has good versatility.

伴随着玻利维亚、厄瓜多尔和委内瑞拉三个拉美国家相继通知退出ICSID公约，国际法理论界与实务界在理解与适用ICSID公约的退出条款问题上产生了分歧。究其原因，对公约第72条中的“同意”一词理解不同乃关键所在。ICSID公约第72条中的“同意”应被解释为“同意要约”或“单方同意”。东道国受ICSID管辖的“同意”一旦做出，即成为其一项强制性的国际义务，该“同意要约”具有不可撤销性。退出国在通知退出前所作的受ICSID管辖的“同意要约”非但在退出前有效，而且在通知退出与退出生效之间的“缓冲期”内仍能保持效力，即便退出ICSID公约生效后，依然有效。但有权“接受”退出国“同意要约”的投资必须为东道国退出ICSID公约生效前已进行的投资。

The three Latin American countries, namely Bolivia, Ecuador and Venezuela, successively denounced the ICSID Convention, international law theorists as well as the practitioners diverge a lot on the issue of comprehending and applying the denunciation clauses in the ICSID Convention. The critical reason is that they have different understanding of the word “consent” in Article 72 of the Convention. “Consent” in Article 72 of the ICSID Convention shall be interpreted as “offer of consent” or “unilateral consent”. Once the “consent” to subject to ICSID jurisdiction has been given by the host state, it amounts to a compulsory international obligation, and the “offer of consent” becomes irrevocable. The “offer of consent” to subject to ICSID jurisdiction given before the denunciation notice by the denunciation country is acceptable not only before the denunciation, but also during the “waiting period” (between the denunciation notice and effectiveness of the denunc